This week we celebrate fire prevention week, as we do in the first full week of October of every year. Schools will join with their local fire service professionals and kids will bring home fire safety checklists and escape plans. Some may even exercise their escape plans and run through the house with checklists in hand. Nothing scares parents more than the thought of not being able to save their children from a fire. House fires in 2008 were down 3% from the previous year, but there were still more than half a million of them. There were still nearly 3,000 civilian fire deaths last year, the majority of those deaths among small children and the elderly. When you think about it, fires are taking our future and our wisdom. I don’t think we can afford to lose either.
People shake their heads saying things like, “What a shame,” when people die in fires. This is done with an attitude of helplessness and sadly, relief (that it wasn’t them). And this is part of the problem. We see news stories about death from fire every day and and think, “Those poor people.” But when you turn it on them and ask what they would do if it were them, you get a blank stare and answers like, “We’re very careful,” and “We have working smoke detectors.” Being careful and having smoke detectors that work are very important, and these preventative steps are highly important to the safety of your family. Let’s face it, the two largest causes of single family home fires continues to be careless cooking and smoking.
There are two reasons for the reduction of fire deaths in the country. Fire prevention activities in construction and awareness is the biggest. Fires overall, not just structure fire, were down about 7%. There are less forest fires and less car fires by 7% and 9% respectively, but house fires, where we live and sleep and are most vulnerable, are only down 3%. We’re not being as careful as we should be. Another smaller reason for less deaths is that emergency medical care and burn care continue to improve. There were almost 15,000 civilian fire injuries last year. There are few injuries that cause such negative lifelong life changes as burn injuries. Simply put, burns scar for life. Our homes aren’t as safe as we’d like to think. No one affected by a fire injury or death went to bed wanting that to happen. How many times have you misplaced your car keys? Forgotten to grab something at the store? Left the toaster plugged in? Most fires are caused by simple mind slips we’re all guilty of from time to time.
We’re all careful. We change the batteries in our smoke detectors. We have fire drills. We cook carefully and make sure our smoking materials are all the way out. We don’t let ourselves forget fire safety things!!! That’s all well and good fire prevention, but it doesn’t solve all of the problems. Cooking causes 40% of the fires but only 17% of the deaths. Why? Because usually we’re awake and alert when we cook. Careless smoking accounts for a whopping quarter of all fire deaths! So, smoke outside. Make sure all smoking materials are completely extinguished before retiring or leaving. Never smoke in bed. Do all of those things - they’re excellent ways to change that horrible statistic.
Now for the scary part. The fire service tends to spend the most time educating the public on the greatest dangers. But we may have missed the bus in one very serious area. Only a quarter of the fires in 2008 involved some sort of equipment failure in the house - whether it be electrical or heating related. But those fires caused 35% of the fire deaths and almost 20% of the injuries. That statistic tells us that heating equipment and electrical fires are much more likely to kill us than simply cause us harm. Many of these deaths occurred during the night, when home occupants are most likely to be sleeping. Ah, but you have working smoke detectors and who hasn’t read the adage, “Smoke detectors save lives?”
The truth is, smoke detectors do NOT save lives. They enable the saving of lives, surely, but the existence of an uncontrolled fire requires a response from people inside and out to make a difference. That smoke detector can make all the noise it wants; if no one responds to the alarm, lives will not be saved. If the occupants do not, or worse, cannot, move themselves to safety, then the smoke detector can’t take credit as a savior. Last week, in a county to my north, a tragedy occurred. An elderly grandfather, who suffered paralysis from a stroke, died in a house fire. The smoke detector worked. The caretaker even responded and tried her best to move the man, but did not have the strength. Neighbors tried to help, but couldn’t get to him - the fire had grown too large too quickly. This is not a unique story. In fact, the story is all too common. The names change and the reason for inability to respond are somewhat different, but the helplessness of it all is oh so common. We aren’t helpless, though. In fact, the smart people who decide what houses should be like when they’re built, have already found and are trying to institute the solution!
Residential fire sprinkler systems SAVE LIVES! And they don’t require the occupants to do a thing. The International Residential Building Code is the adopted building code throughout most jurisdictions in the United States for single family and two-unit homes. In it is the requirement that a residential fire sprinkler system be installed in all new construction. Many areas, including my home state have deleted this requirement from the building codes adopted. Naturally one would ask why such a common sense idea would be deleted from the codes.The biggest opponent, and a large one they are, are the home builders organizations throughout the country. Their sole major argument against residential fire sprinklers is that they would add about 10% to 15% to the cost of a new home. Their argument is a little bit true. In a smaller home, say three or four bedrooms in one or two stories, the additional cost would be about 10% to 15%. In studies conducted in areas where sprinklers are and are not required, and in the same economic zones, the up cost was more like 3% to 5%. They argue that any increases in building costs would further suppress new home starts in a sagging economy. Those same home builders think NOTHING of talking home buyers into granite counter tops and European appliances, or marble floors, upscale toilets, whirlpools and shower towers. These upgrades can all, by themselves, add easily the same percentage points to new house construction costs. And they don’t protect a single life. The minor argument is that fire sprinklers are ugly. Fire sprinkler heads hide in recessed pockets in the ceiling, and only activate when subjected to fire (only the head or heads in the area of the fire will come on, too. They don’t all come on at once). They hide nicely behind a circular disk. I wouldn’t call it stylish, but neither is an electrical outlet, and you couldn’t build a house without a few of those.
What can you do? If you’re building a new house, put the marble and granite samples aside and insist on a fire sprinkler system first. Even if you’re not building, statistics prove that most people will move and upgrade their housing in their lifetimes. Wouldn’t you feel like you’re making a real upgrade if your new home has fire sprinklers installed? Encourage your local officials to pass ordinances requiring fire sprinklers in residential homes. If enough of the country does that, the new code will stick and soon, as with vehicle air bags in the 1980’s, everyone will be doing it!




