MIchael Jackson case - So who thinks he did it?

My2Beauties wrote: I'm watching this special on Vh1 about him - weird character and his fascination about little boys gives me the heebee jeebees! So I think he's gulity

what about everyone else?

mckayleesmom replied: I think hes a wacko...yet I think hes innocent and I think the parents of those kids are after money...If your next door neighbor was accussed of molesting someone...yet found innocent I see no other reason why you would send your child over there or not...I would never send Mckaylee...found innocent or not. Those people in my opinion sent their children over there as bait to get money.

stanleygirl replied: I think he's guilty, and I think the boys parents knew something was going on, and decided to manipulate the situation to make money. IMO they used their son as bait, in order to make money, but yeah I think MJ is guilty. This is not the only kid saying he did this, kwim?
And if he was innocent I think he would have stopped sleeping with the kids after the first accusation.
I feel terrible for the boy though, either way. He has been through so much and obviously his parents have serious issues.

My2Beauties replied: Yes I should have elaborated. We were talking about this at work one day - no in way in he** would I have ever sent my child over there after the first accusations. Those parents had an idea of what was going on and I think they used their child in order to get paid! However I do think he's guilty, I think he's a nasty ol' molester!

lisar replied: I think he is a wacko. i think he did it mainly cause this isnt first time someone has said this. And on one of his last ones (if I am correct not sure) he paid them so it wouldnt go to court. If i was innocent then I would fight it till the end. But this one I dont know. Of course the parents are after money but what if he did do it? We will see before long what the jury thinks. And even if he did do it. Do you think he will go to prison?

Lisa

kel replied: IMO, where there is smoke there is fire..sure, he is a musical icon but that does not excuse his odd behaviour..he has been hanging around little boys for years and years..if he was a normal average "joe" he would have been arrested years ago..and how about that "baby balcony " thing? he is not thinking like a logical person!!he is capable of ANYTHING!
to be honest it makes me sick when i think about how his lawyers have handled this..they havent really adressed the issue of "abuse" in court..instead they have tried to portray the mother as some crazy person..which she may well be and yes,she may need cash..but what 13 year old is going to say that unless its true.?? (knowing the stigma that will be attached?).and he isnt the first..if he was i might think differently..
i also saw latoya jacksons true hollwood story and she claimed at one point (she was estranged from her family ) that her father had sexually molested her and her sisters for YEARS..im thinking if this is true..could he (joe) have done the same to micheal? of course she denies it now but i think she maent it when she said it and took it back after her divorce..
sorry for blabbing..but i will be really peeved if he gets off

ions_momma replied: I think he is guilty. I was listening to an interveiw with him on the radio one day a few months ago and he kept telling the lady that was interviewing him that he would love to meet her son and that the lady should bring him to his house sometime! Never in my life would I let my child go near him!

bwalkerletters replied: I think the parents should go to jail with Michael. They know he's whacked out!

luvbug00 replied: I feel horible for him. The man was a star at five. He had no childhood. I believe he is guilty. I also am beginig to think his father molested him and that is how he interpets love. Did you see the old man running arround the courthouse looking for Michael? I would never let Mya spend the night at anyones house if there were no other children present and cirtenly not in the same bed. He supposedly is in serious dept and the news ( soo reliable i know..) said that he may be forced to see the beatles and Elvis library and after that he will have nothing. we'll see i guess.

Jamielou replied:
you said it i think i would have never let my kids go over there in the first place and i also think he is guilty and the parents just want money.....

jcc64 replied: I think for virtually his entire life he has been surrounded by people who for various reasons have indulged his eccentricities to such a degree that he is no longer capable of understanding right from wrong, or what is abnormal or immoral. I don't believe he's been told "No" many times since childhood. If he wants something, whether it be a ferris wheel, or a pet gorilla or the entire catalogue of Beatles music, or a pre-pubescent boy to "play" with, by God, he should have it bc he's Michael Jackson. I truly believe he thinks he's innocent- that his behavior is completely acceptable and that he is just grossly misunderstood by a cruel and unfeeling society.
I don't believe he's innocent. Nor do I believe the various parents, lawyers, handlers, managers, and hangers-on are innocent. Everyone's hands are dirty, except of course the victims. I really resent having to explain all of this to my 9 yr old.
The whole affair is an embarassment.

JessC replied: I personally think that he had a rough childhood and basically scarred him. I mean, his dad sounds like he was an awful parent, but I dont really know if he is guilty or not, I dont really know what to think, I dont know him as a person, or not even listen to his music alot so I dont know... its hard to say... he could be guilty he could not, and it could also be like someone just wanting to sue him for money just like those girls did for sueing mcdonalds and wendys cause they found a finger in their chili!

gr33n3y3z replied:
I agree
And how could a parent send their child into harms way to M.J is beyond me