Parenting Club - Parenting Advice, Parenting Message Boards, Baby Message Boards, Pregnancy Message Boards, TTC Messge Boards
Shop for Baby Items | Parenting & Family Blogs

Star Trek - The Motion Picture: The Director's Cut (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition)


Star Trek - The Motion Picture: The Director's Cut (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition) Image  Manufacturer: Paramount
Find all by Paramount

Audience Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Theatrical Release: August 28, 2008

Average Rating: 4 out of 5 Stars

Retail Price: $12.98
Online Sale Price: $8.99
Save $3.99 Today!
* Price is subject to change.
This item qualifies for
Free Super Saver Shipping!
Starring: Majel Barrett, Ralph Brannen, Roger Aaron Brown, Ralph Byers, Stephen Collins

Admiral Kirk & the crew of the refurbished Enterprise attempt to stop an unidentified alien from reaching Earth.
Genre: Science Fiction
Rating: PG
Release Date: 10-APR-2007
Media Type: DVD


User Submitted Star Trek - The Motion Picture: The Director's Cut (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition) Reviews


July 20, 2008
A below-average Star Trek Film.
I am still amazed that there are people who will give this a 5-star rating. When first released the movie had one main attraction: The reunion of the original series crew. Being a huge Star Trek fan I went to see it in the theater three times. But even then, before any other ST films were released it was obvious there were problems. Even when you take in the "Director's Cut" that has since been released, updating the look and feel of the movie, it still suffers from one major problem: The story sucked! It ended up being nothing more than a rehash of a couple of shows from the original series.

Back in 1979 I listened to a radio interview with Walter Koenig after the movie was released and he basically stated that they started off filming with half a script. Because of the tightness of the shooting schedule there were many times they filmed with only an outline for certain scenes. The film feels that way. There are many scenes that seemed contrived, like the actors were winging it. Some of the acting was horrible (Persis Khambata), some of it was bland (Walter Koenig, George Takei), and some of it was just unecessary (Majel Barrett, Grace Lee Whitney). The best acting on the film was turned in by Stephen Collins (future dad on 7th Heaven - Seasons 1-5). His character was interesting. His constant sparring with Admiral Kirk was one of the highlights of the film, giving the picture a great tension within the plot. Leonard Nimoy's portrayal of Spock was OK for this film but lacked originality. At the beginning he's 100% emotionless but by the end of the film he embraces his emotions. This would have been much more interesting had we not seen it 3 - 4 times in the original series.

One other problem, there were times that the movie drags. Two scenes in particular: When Scott is taking Kirk over to the Enterprize in a shuttle we're treated to a 10 minute dragging "inspection" of the ship. Interesting for the first 5 minutes, it gets old quickly. But that pales in comparrison to the scene showing the Enterprize entering the Vger cloud. That seemed to go on forever. The only good thing about it, you had enough time to get up, go to the restroom, then stand in line to buy another box of Bon Bons, and still get back before it was over.

Are there things to like here? Absolutely! Jerry Goldsmith's soundtrack was astounding! No wonder TNG stole it. And, again, the reunion of the cast 10 years after the cancellation of the series was fun to watch. But once you got to see Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan - The Director's Cut (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition) you really do realize how bad this movie was. Did they improve it when releasing the "Director's Cut" on DVD? Yes, but only the look and feel of the movie. Even with the extended scenes added, it still ends up towards the bottom of the Star Trek Movie list, just a bit above (maybe) Star Trek V - The Final Frontier (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition).

July 11, 2008
An Ambitious But Ultimately Modest Film
I've always enjoyed Star Trek. Although it was never quite my favorite science fiction series, I appreciated it for what it was and simply loved many of the characters and ideals that it gave life to. As I've gotten older, I've become most fond of the original series. I was very young when "Star Trek: The Motion Picture" was released, and always seemed to just miss it when it was replayed on television. Having viewed most of the original series, I decided to pick the film up on DVD and give it a shot. What I saw was a drab, drawn out version of the colorful, often humorous series.

In this first film outing, an unknown alien force is making its way to Earth. On the way, it destroys Klingon and Federation ships. In an attempt to stop its progress and find out exactly what it is, Starfleet employs the Enterprise and her crew, headed up by Captain Decker (Stephen Collins, "Seventh Heaven"). Of course, the Enterprise without Captain Kirk (William Shatner)is like peanut butter without jelly, so Admiral Kirk boards the vessel per Starfleet and takes command. This opens up a brief but interesting divide between Kirk and Decker. It isn't until Kirk's conscious, Dr. McCoy (DeForest Kelley), arrives that this feud is settled. The rest of the gang is already aboard the Enterprise, excepting Spock (Leonard Nimoy), who does eventually join up with his old comrades. Along with Decker, a new addition to the crew is the Deltan, Ilia (Persis Khambatta), who will play a key role later in the film.

As the Enterprise takes flight, the story of the unknown alien unfolds, and unlike most other science fiction stories set in space at that time, there is very little dogfighting between starships, hungry aliens or laser duels. Instead, there's a refreshing yet very "Star Trek" tale of a misdirected being looking for guidance. It's a wonderful story, but it's poorly executed.

In this DVD, the Director's Cut, Robert Wise takes Alan Dean Foster's epic story and draws it out to its limits. There are long sequences highlighting the vastness of space, the massive size of the alien entity, and even San Francisco Bay. Mind you, they are all very impressive to look at, but I feel as if some of them could have been a bit shorter. The team that dressed up this version of the film did many wonders with backdrops, sound fx and even the musical score. Perhaps the greatest improvements are those of the planet Vulcan, which looks simply brilliant in this film. The improvements, for the most part, are seamlessly tied into the 1979 film.

Jerry Goldsmith's score is brilliant. If any one thing keeps you from becoming too bored with this film, it's the music. Goldsmith masterfully captures the adventurous and epic feel of this film.

The cast do a decent job. While Nichelle Nichols, George Takei and Walter Koenig are relegated to window dressing for the most part, James Doohan and DeForest Kelley do get a little more time to shine. As expected, Shatner and Nimoy are at the forefront of the film. Collins does an excellent job as the somewhat jilted Decker. Persis Khambatta proves that bald can be beautiful and she's simply a wonder to look at on the screen. Fans of the series will also note the presence of popular series regulars Majel Barrett (Dr. Chapel) and Grace Lee Whitney (Rand).

The special features on this film are very nice. Highlights include a brief documentary on the ups-and-downs of getting the film to the screen, a neat look at the development of the new fx for the Director's Cut, and scenes from the original film that were deleted or altered for this updated version. Also included are scenes from the TV release of the film that were not in the theatrical release. Other obligatory extras can also be found.

For true fans of the original series, this is sure to be a treat. It was very much welcomed when it was first released due to the fact that the series had been off the air for so long. I'm sure that lifetime fans will also appreciate the updates made to this film. However, when compared to the rest of the Star Trek films (including the TNG ones) and, most importantly, the original series, this film is merely a hint as to what great stories were to come. Recommended for fans of Star Trek, completionists who want all of the films in the series, and fans of smart sci-fi who don't necessarily need to see a blaster or dogfight every five minutes to keep them interested.

June 26, 2008
A film 22 years in the making, and worth the wait.
I must admit that I did not see Star Trek during its initial run. I was only 4 when it started airing in 1966. I did see it in syndication, and I saw The Animated Series on Saturday mornings. In 1979, my parents brought cable TV into the house, and it was on one of the Los Angeles stations that I saw my first trailer for Star Trek - The Motion Picture. I thought the Enterprise looked gorgeous. So when that December came, I saw the film in the theatre. It looked like Star Trek - all the people were there, the ship was there (and nicely updated), the basic premise of Star Trek was there. But it didn't quite feel like Star Trek. I still devoured it - it was Star Trek, which meant to me that it was still better than the vast majority of junk which showed up on TV and movie screens at the time (and still persists to this day, although SF/Fantasy has made great strides).

Then came the Extended Edition on VHS. Yes, the added special effects were very nice, but it still didn't feel like Star Trek.

This edition - Star Trek - The Motion Picture: The Director's Cut (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition) - finally gives Robert Wise the chance to do what he wanted to back in 1979 - finish the film he started making. Gone are the Red Alert "beeps" and silly computer voice-overs ("Intruder Alert! Intruder Alert! Location - a sonic shower."), and in its place is dialogue and the familiar Red Alert Klaxon (albeit not as strident as in the series). The editing has been tightened up and effects put in place to remind you that you're on a starship in space. All minor tweaks to the film. That's what it needed.

After 22 years, Star Trek - The Motion Picture finally feels like Star Trek, even while holding to Gene Roddenberry's initial vision of Star Trek as shown in "The Cage" as opposed to the remaining episodes. It's not the best film in the series, but it's not the worst, either, and its success at the box office paved the way for the film series. This is definitely the edition to get.

June 24, 2008
If This DVD Is Not Your Favorite Star Trek Movie You Are NOT A True Original Fan Of The Series!
This review is for "Star Trek - The Motion Picture: The Director's Cut (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition)," and reflects upon my connections to Star Trek and why I believe it is the best of the movies. It is not a rehash of what is or is not in the film. Other reviews have gone out of their way to provide that "information."

Imagine, if you can, seeing "old friends," with whom you had spent numerous hours intellectualizing and debating, for the first time in over 10 years--because they had inexplicably disappeared! This is what happened for me around 7 December 1979. After years of rumors and slowly waining belief, I sat in front of the big screen in an old fashioned Studio Movie Theater and saw my "old friends." In that theater with me were over fifteen friends, all in awe as the camera slowly and gracefully paid homage to the Starship Enterprise and each of her crew members--our "old friends" were back! We were "in heaven, man!" And we spent all of our college break discussing (and going to see again) "Star Trek: The Motion Picture."

Now, imagine after another 22 years, seeing those "old friends" show up "looking" far better--and the way you imagined they should have appeared when you saw them again for the first time! If you can imagine this happening, then you will/can truly understand the greatness of "Star Trek - The Motion Picture: The Director's Cut (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition)."

Unabashedly, I must make it clear that starting on 8 September 1966, I became a fanatical, die hard, true blue, crusading fan of what I felt was the greatest television show ever made. On 3 June 1969, after cringing my way through a sloppy third season (a season in which Gene Roddenberry was blocked every step of the way), I, and all the friends I had converted, mourned in seething anger; anger that did not "cool off" until the show began in syndication. In deed, I was such a "true friend" of (the original) Star Trek television show, I was unable to watch any episodes of the Star Trek: The Next Generation television show (despite the fact that Gene Roddenberry was heavily involved) until Leonard Nimoy guest starred. And, again, I must say that my only regret in doing so, was my failure to share the Star Trek world with my son.

And why do I think this is the best of the Star Trek movies--beyond the afore mentioned sentiment? One reason, and one reason only: "Star Trek: The Motion Picture" is the ONLY movie over which the creator and genius behind Star Trek--Gene Roddenberry--had any "true" involvement. While in the final analysis the film is Robert Wise's "baby," Wise has done an extraordinary job of bringing the television show to the theater's big screen--particularly in the beautifully revamped director's cut--that empathetically broadens Roddenberry's vision of Star Trek. No other director (even if they were "open" to such) was provided the same depth of Roddenberry's input, as that of "Star Trek: The Motion Picture." The original release was a great bridge to the wide world of motion pictures, but a bridge that was and (judging by the reviews panning the film) remains ignored. And, despite the fact that "Star Trek - The Motion Picture: The Director's Cut (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition)" does an even better job of presenting that bridge, it seems that today's fans have either never understood or have forgotten what Star Trek is all about: intelligence; compassion; equality and fairness; symbolism and analogy; social awareness; controversy; and wonderful, fun, thought provoking, imperturbable entertainment. Thank you Gene Roddenberry for the wonder of Star Trek. And thank you Robert Wise for trying to guide Star Trek from television to theater. Please know, that at least this reviewer recognizes and is thrilled that you have been given the chance to flush out your vision in "Star Trek - The Motion Picture: The Director's Cut (Two-Disc Special Collector's Edition)" as to where our "old friends" should have gone: "...where no man has gone before."

Update--1 July 2008: If this review was not helpful to you, I would appreciate learning the reason(s) so I can improve my reviews. My goal is to provide help to potential buyers, not get into any arguments. So, if you only disagree with my opinion, could you please say so in the comments and not indicate that the review was not helpful. Thanks.

June 12, 2008
I must agree with the two stars
I just started watching the old Star Trek series about two months ago, and I've grown addicted to it. It's like my Lost. It's just really great TV, cheese and all. I love it. Then it dawned on me that I should be watching the movies. If the series is good, the movies must be great!
But this movie, not so much. This one is DEFINITELY a renter, man. It is true that it's great to see the intros of the old cast and all, but that aside, the movie is lame in a way I never foresaw. At least half of it is waiting around for stuff to happen, or VERY drawn out displays of the environment. I should really go back and time how long the intro was where they show the Enterprise for the first time. And then the scenes of when they venture inside the alien are all unbearably long. It's a movie that could've easily been condensed into forty minutes worth of substance.
The effects are good, the characters are decent (though lacking somewhat), the plot is forgivable, the audio is atrocious, and the story just....really takes too long to get told. I was disappointed.

June 8, 2008
Straying Too Far From Its Roots
Often times when a hit TV show makes the jump to the big screen, that show loses one or more key elements of what makes the show a hit in the first place. This was exactly the case with Star Trek: The Motion Picture.

The core of Star Trek: The Original Series was its thought-provoking plots, spectacular action, subtle humor, and character developement. This first motion picture only succeed in one of those areas. Let's quickly examine each of those areas to see where this move succeeded and failed:

Plot: The plot of this movie is a very well-defined script that (without spoiling anything) produces an incredible surprise ending that very few viewers likely saw coming. Essentially, the Enterprise is sent to investigate a strange cloud-like phenomena that is wreaking havoc on the galaxies. While invesigating, they find that the phenomena is more intimately linked to themselves than they could possibly imagine.

Action: While this film contains some spectacular special effects, it ultimately is bogged down by long, and rather boring, periods of pure dialogue. Though some people are amazed by the endless panning shots of the "new" U.S.S. Enterprise, I found it to be way too overdone.

Humor: This aspect that was so popular in the Original Series is severely lacking in this first film. The entire movie has a very serious tone that does not include much witty banter or light moments.

Character Developement: In my mind, the ultimate success of the entire Star Trek franchise hinges on the notion of character developement. By using an ensemble cast, the Original Series was able to develop their auxiliary characters (albeit not as much as they should have!) into important members of the show. This movie, however, focuses too much on "foreign" characters (those not seen in the TV show).

To conclude, while Star Trek: The Motion Picture featured a thought-provoking plot that harkened back to the days of the Original Series, it also strayed too far from the core of that show to be considered a classic film. Even the drab grey/white uniforms conveyed a serious, non-fun feel to the entire picture. If you want to get acclimated to the Star Trek universe, do not start your quest with this film (instead, skip to the second movie). However, if you could care less about the cannon of the show and want to watch a thought-provoking sci-fi film, than you will likely enjoy most aspects of this movie.

June 8, 2008
Straying Too Far From Its Roots
Often times when a hit TV show makes the jump to the big screen, that show loses one or more key elements of what makes the show a hit in the first place. This was exactly the case with Star Trek: The Motion Picture.

The core of Star Trek: The Original Series was its thought-provoking plots, spectacular action, subtle humor, and character developement. This first motion picture only succeed in one of those areas. Let's quickly examine each of those areas to see where this move succeeded and failed:

Plot: The plot of this movie is a very well-defined script that (without spoiling anything) produces an incredible surprise ending that very few viewers likely saw coming. Essentially, the Enterprise is sent to investigate a strange cloud-like phenomena that is wreaking havoc on the galaxies. While invesigating, they find that the phenomena is more intimately linked to themselves than they could possibly imagine.

Action: While this film contains some spectacular special effects, it ultimately is bogged down by long, and rather boring, periods of pure dialogue. Though some people are amazed by the endless panning shots of the "new" U.S.S. Enterprise, I found it to be way too overdone.

Humor: This aspect that was so popular in the Original Series is severely lacking in this first film. The entire movie has a very serious tone that does not include much witty banter or light moments.

Character Developement: In my mind, the ultimate success of the entire Star Trek franchise hinges on the notion of character developement. By using an ensemble cast, the Original Series was able to develop their auxiliary characters (albeit not as much as they should have!) into important members of the show. This movie, however, focuses too much on "foreign" characters (those not seen in the TV show).

To conclude, while Star Trek: The Motion Picture featured a thought-provoking plot that harkened back to the days of the Original Series, it also strayed too far from the core of that show to be considered a classic film. Even the drab grey/white uniforms conveyed a serious, non-fun feel to the entire picture. If you want to get acclimated to the Star Trek universe, do not start your quest with this film (instead, skip to the second movie). However, if you could care less about the cannon of the show and want to watch a thought-provoking sci-fi film, than you will likely enjoy most aspects of this movie.

June 3, 2008
Star Trek 1
Packaging and disks were fine. Dialog audio was awful. Had to turn it up so loud that music and sound effects broke the sound barrier. One wonders if the fault lies with the supplier or the production company.

May 12, 2008
Crayola Scrawls
I scorn to mention particulars about "Star Trek: The Motion Picture." You may assume--and correctly--that my general observations are supported thoroughly by the evidence of specific details in the film--if you care to watch it.

This film's script must have been written up--nay, scribbled down--with crayola scrawls. The story and dialogue are childish; this is science fiction for seven-year-olds. The characterizations are embarrassing. The film's pace is labored--there is no excitement in extended sequences of wondering faces and meaningless spectral visuals. The magnificent grandeur of the score is shackled, thoughtlessly, to the rank stupidity on the screen. The special effects are "cool"--but that's merely admitting that the film has visual style. Without story substance, this supposed "work of art" is a house of cards the slightest puff of objective criticism can blow down. Critical viewer: do it. Blowing it down is easy, and it's the very gesture of contempt a film like this deserves.

This review refers to the director's cut, two-disc special collector's edition. Disc two of two has plenty of extra features--in other words, much ado about nothing.

April 21, 2008
Colorless, uninteresting resumption of the Star Trek legacy
Take an original Star Trek episode and draw it out to three times the usual length, take away the humor, throw in some post-Star wars special effects, and finally add in some uninteresting new characters, and there you have it "Star Trek - The Motion Picture".
Admittedly there is some initial fun in seeing the old crew back after a ten year hiatus but this fun drains away pretty quickly. Long, boring and colorless - right down to the drab production design - even fans will struggle to sit through this one. You get the feeling that director Robert Wise was so conscious of being respectful of the material that he ended up embalming it. If this review is not warning enough, this film has been recut twice all to no avail.

 


 

CommunityNewsResources | Entertainment | Link To Us |Terms of Use | Privacy PolicyAdvertising
©2004 Parenting Club.com All Rights Reserved